Updated Nov. 27, 2010 — 11:25 a.m.
By Adam Popescu, Beverly Hills Courier
The City of Beverly Hills filed suit Wednesday against itself in the person of City Clerk Byron Pope.
Pope
didn't do anything wrong—just his job as clerk. On Sept. 15, he
accepted and filed a petition from G & L Properties, the derisive
initiative to bring two hour free parking to City lots.
An initiative
the City now claims is illegal.
Pope did his duty as required by law,
but the City Council, stumped by the two-hour "free parking" initiative
and faced with what appears to be overwhelming public support for
two-hour free parking, decided to sue itself.
After the mid-term
elections, staff began exploring whether or not newly passed
propositions made the proposal illegal. “The City is in fact challenging
the legality of this initiative," Deputy City Manager Cheryl Friedling
confirmed Tuesday.
“The City believes that the initiative is
invalid on several grounds,” City Attorney Larry Wiener wrote to The
Courier in an e-mail. “The lawsuit asks the court to order the elections
official to remove the initiative from the ballot because it is
invalid. Byron Pope, as City Clerk, is the elections official. So, in
that capacity, he must be named in the lawsuit. This has nothing to do
with Byron Pope personally.”
Wiener said this situation is not unique, and that there have been many similar lawsuits in other communities over the years.
The
controversial measure has dominated City Council sessions for months.
Last Tuesday's meeting saw the Council authorize Wiener to file the
lawsuit challenging the ballot measure.
“This is the standard
procedure for challenging an invalid measure that has been placed on the
ballot through the initiative process,” Wiener said.
City
concern over the measure stemmed from a projected budget shortfall of
approximately $2 million in the Parking Enterprise Fund.
If the measure
passes, the total deficit is estimated at $3.5 million, according to
Director of Parking Operations Chad Lynn.
The council wants flexibility
to raise parking rates whenever it chooses and the initiative would
block that discretion.
The City, which collects well over $140 million
from businesses, allocates which income and expenses go into the
"parking fund," leaving open the question of whether there is truly an
inherent "deficit" or if the shortfall is manipulated by accounting
allocations.
Four years ago, restoration of the tradition of two hour
free parking was a major issue in the city council election that saw
current Mayor Jimmy Delshad and Councilwoman Nancy Krasne defeat
incumbent Steve Webb. Delshad and Krasne favored restoration of the two
hour free parking; Webb opposed.
The proposed 7.5 percent
commercial parking operators tax would not generate enough revenue to
cover increased cost of the measure and if passed, the measure's fiscal
impact on the City's budget would not cover the increased deficit, City
Treasurer Eliot Finkel said in September.
The initiative to
bring free two hour parking to the City of Beverly Hills is spearheaded
by G & L Properties, who submitted the petition Sept. 15.
The
measure seeks to make two hour free parking mandatory at most City-owned
parking lots.
Private parking lot operators appeared before the
council last week to object to a new tax, arguing that they have already
complied with city requirements, they pay large business taxes already,
and that parking prices are embedded in the overall terms of their
leases with tenants.
Unless blocked by court action, the initiative will appear on the March city ballot.